 |
| <- Previous Page |
|
|
The Essential Audit Toolkit: Best Practices For Smaller Entities - NEW
|
|
|
| Date |
November 10, 2010
|
|
| Location | German American Society, Omaha, NE |
|
|
| Course Time |
|
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. |
|
|
The objective of this course is to provide best practices for critical aspects of audits of smaller entities.
|
| Course Highlights & Objectives |
|
Clarifying how the key components of internal controls “fit together” in a “top-down” approach to designing “key controls” over reliable financial reporting to avoid material weaknesses in design of internal control. Clarifying the most significant differences in responsibilities related to the various scopes of attest services that public accountants provide, including tips for avoiding misunderstandings with client management and those charged with governance. Describing specific possible alterations to a typical detailed audit plan for a smaller non-public entity based on various risk of material misstatement assessments. Describing typical quality control deficiencies related to documenting the nature, timing and extent of further audit procedures and conclusions. Outlining the pros and cons of “stepping down” in scope of services from an audit to a review or compilation from both the auditor’s and the client’s perspective. Properly performing and documenting the required risk assessment procedures, including how the various risk assessment activities build upon each other to support ultimate conclusions regarding risks of material misstatement. Providing factors to consider during required engagement team discussions, including real-life examples of potential identified risks and the potential impact on the detailed audit plan. Providing real-life, practical examples of documenting the identification and evaluation of the design and implementation of key internal controls for typical significant classes of transactions within smaller non-public entities. Tailoring the standard engagement letter when public accountants provide clients with both attest and non-attest services. Tips for justifying the rationale and basis for independence conclusions when both attest and non-attest services (like bookkeeping or drafting financial statements) are provided for audit clients, as well as evaluating deficiencies in internal controls that may need to be communicated to the client as a result. Typical engagement wrap-up issues and concerns.
|
|
| Who Should Attend |
|
| Professionals interested in gaining practical insights into how to prevent common audit deficiencies. |
| Course Level | Basic |
| Prerequisites | None |
|
|
|
|
|
| Discussion Leader | Brian D. Kush, Surgent McCoy, CPE LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
| Additional Information: |
Parking is available on site and lunch is provided. |
|
|
| Fee |
$230 - Society Member
$260 - Society Nonmember |
|
|
| <- Previous Page |
|
